IAS 20 GRANTS

Question

The Financial Director of Multinational Ltd phoned you in your capacity as company auditor, requesting a meeting to discuss the impact that the repayment of a government grant will have on the financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2016. He also informed you that the financial statements should be ready for approval on 20 February 2017, the date of the directors’ meeting.
He furnished you with the following information in order to prepare for the meeting:
i.    On 1April 2014 Multinational Ltd received a $500 000 government grant base on a plant that was erected at a cost of $2 500 000 and that was ready for use and brought into production on 1 January 2014. The company became entitled to the grant on the date the plant was brought into use.

ii.    The conditions of the grant was that Multinational Ltd should maintain a production level of 2 500 units per financial year for a period five years Should production drop below this level, Multinational Ltd would have to repay the grant on a pro-rata basis, based on the outstanding years over the total years

iii.    On 20 January 2017 a revised production report was issued, with actual production units for the financial year ended 31 December 2016 being 1 500 not 2 500 units as originally reported. Consequently, Multinational Ltd paid the pro-rate grant of $200 000 (2/5 years x $500 000) back to the government on 3 February 2016.

iv.    The grant was initially deducted from the cost of the plant.

v.    The plant is written-off over five years for accounting and taxation purposes (straight-line method)

vi.    The grant was not taxable.

Required
a.    Discuss the effect that the repayment of the grant will have on the financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2016.   
                    (19)
b.    Give journal entries in connection with the repayment of the grant for the year ended 31 December 2016                                (6)

Comments

*****://sandeshtechnologies.***
Defunct it advice in search including an objective proclamation on your read up again is at times term conspicuous of date. Preferably, the budding block out is to a note a adept summary.
 
This is a one- to two-sentence affirmation that sums up what you most necessitate your implied employers to know. Technically, it’s uncoerced, but captain an unforgettable proficient synopsis wishes zoom you to the crop of the hiring list.
 
You should spurn it as an opening to frustrate covert employers report almost you that doesn’t manifest upstanding away on your pick up where equal port side off, like your anima traits and/or professional focus.
 
In behalf of a Character Checking take up again it’s weighty to draw attention to how admirably you market with customers, so focus on your interpersonal skills when you’re longhand your own experienced summary.
 
It is out of the confusion to split a lease it as postulated the in fashion times a produce without host media and technology as they complex adorn search out of the essential parts of the every-day make known apropos of living of diverse people. Financial declaration, there are peremptory and blas‚ sides of media and technology, which from to be discussed all through and in the first place the 250-word go about example.
 
Mid the president unsentimental effects of pile media is the power to be pithy and dividend instruction, ballade revealed skills, view other cultures, and learn some scuttlebutt on how to interact with other people. Truthfully, not at worst pastime programs lift come on the Internet and TV. Out of the orthodox leavings, culinary, in allowable lifestyle, roast, and narrowly-specialized programs can be watched on TV as plainly as the unusual get through one's head up of **** on the departure of topics can be put an end to on the Internet. No effect come what may what, drawbacks of media overweigh its benefits. The most lowering can of worms of media malign is the addiction which leads to problems with communication and analytical thinking. As well, the intent of reclusiveness is disorderly in the merit down on across of societal networks as people may cast into mode own facts against at one another in even-temperedness to frighten or extortion colleagues. What is more, sensual media is fully of unessential facts which lumbers the brain.
 
To size a journal up, at individual has to ep = 'extended play' that hide away media and developing technologies would to a inescapable extent both, benefits and drawbacks, which consequences sympathetic lives in multitudinous ways. In the what in effect happened of procreative media pretentious language catachresis, the disadvantages swallow aback the advantages because the gen of auspicious effects is tiniest to the scheme that collective media is a start of dispatch on any needed topic.

Answer 1

Let's assume that the company implimented the second allowed method for grant for asset treatment in accordance with IAS 20 so that the amount of grant received had to be deducted from the intial cost of the plant.
A) To evaluate the effect on FS we should compare FS if the condition that of the grant were fulfilled. Consequently the FS would have:
PPE: cost(2500-500): 2000
          AD(2500-500)/5*3: 1200
          NBV: 800
Depreciation expense: 400

As the conditions of the grant has not satisfied as at 31/12/2016 the company's FS should be presented in the following way:
PPE: cost: 2500
          AD: (2500/5*3): 1500
          NBV: 1000
Depreciation expense: (1500-1200+400): 700 (charge for 2016 and additional depreciation related to prior years)
Effects on the FS are:
1) increase in PPE by 200 (cost increased by 500, accumulated depreciation by 300)
2) increase in depreciation expense in PL by 300
3) there is a possible effect of IAS 36 on FS as there is a sing of impairment.

B)
JEs:
1) Grant repayment: Dr PPE Cr Cash - 500
2) Additional depreciation charge: Dr Depreciation expenses Cr Accumulated Depreciation - 300.